Field Note Notes on Dualisms
Contributor Kristiina Koskentola

Dualisms, such as mind-body, human- non-human and culture-nature, the ‘unbinding’ of the human life from nature and the human and from the non-human means positioning the human as the superior, the only one with a rational consciousness. Due to dualisms our ties to immanent life and our interrelationality have been undone.1 René Descartes (1596 – 1650), a seminal figure in the emergence of modern philosophy and science, and the father of the Cartesian dualism, claimed that the body cannot think. While performing vivisections, he claimed that animals were mere machinale—non-thinking, non-feeling, soulless lower beings. Cartesian dualism rendered the natural world and its beings mute, deaf, inanimate and insentient. Subordinate servants to man, who claimed to be only one capable of communication and making meaning. Human exceptionalism, the idea of human intellect as something superior to that of all our co-beings, has led to the incapability to recognize and to respect their different qualities.

Cartesian dualism spread over the world like a wild fire became the fundamental worldview. It has driven and allowed for colonialisms, tremendous extractivisms, concentration camps for other animal species to maximize their potential for consumption, climate decline, and destruction biodiversity alongside with cultural and spiritual practices and belief systems.

Writer Amitav Ghosh2 points out the Cartesian dualism as the root of the transition from animistic worldviews to humancentric. Utilizing and focusing on this modernist societies (and sciences) became patriarchal, racialised and reductionist- generating exploitative forms of knowledge that were needed for industrialization - and keep fuelling capitalisms. That have become the only “true knowledge”- as opposed to knowledges fostering pluriverse, regeneration, and cultivation that could be considered as vital knowledges, and continuums.

The modernist human has institutionalized gods and situated them outside the natural world.

In my research to oppose dualisms I have been working with Northern shamanisms for a long time. I have had the privilege to meet and work with many shamans in particular in Manchuria (Northeast China) and Southern Mongolia (Inner Mongolian Autonomic Reagion, China). Shamanic cosmologies urge for respectful treatment of the living, animistic and interdependent world that is mystical, complex and delicately resilient. In shamanisms, and in indigenous ontologies in general, there is no single external “reality” or  temporality. In this sense “reality” is a process or relationship or multiple relationships rather than an object.3 For a shaman, rituals are polyvocal, and are generative, deeply rooted points of knowledge production, affirming cosmic and worldly alliances and solidarity with interdependent worlds.4 Ancestors, spirits, animal gods and all phenomena, all entities and beings are active and vital subjectivities and knowledge –generating agencies. Across temporalities and spaces.

“There are magical phenomena, but they are all part of this world”.


-With shaman Selehada, Manchuria, 2023


For the modernist we enter here the terrain of extra-natural and unscientific. However I would rather see this as going beyond this limited understanding of science and its politics, to the terrain of the not-yet known, terrain of re-enfleshing of untangling the body from the violence of dualism (such as in modern science).

After all everything in the universe is energy. Nothing can exist without another.

Dualistic thinking enableb us human to create this mess, the period of human dominance and attendant extinction and environmental devastation known as the Anthropocene, that is the consequence of the “amputations” of the sensitivities and intellects of our co-beings and environments. We need regain our engagement, take responsabilty and humbly acknowledge that we are molecular, we are immanent, we are interdependent, we are intra-acting agencies, and not more (or less) than one being amongst other (beings): physically, emotionally, materially and ethically tangled with and embedded in Earth.5 We humans ourselves are, and are part of multispecies community. This necessitates rejection, or rather excorsims, of dualisms. As oppesed to dualities, continuums celebrate vital materialism and the self-organising forces of matter. Subjectivity of all being and entities. Multiple forms and agencies of knowledge vibrate and course through bodies and beings, organic, inorganic, thoughts, actions and imaginations, making the worlds.

“Within the porous landscape a shaman worships his holy mountain. May dried out rivers and waterfalls and the damaged land resurrect, come to life”.
- Excerpt from the film installation Flesh and Metal. Light and Oil. Kristiina Koskentola (2020): Reflecting the ceremony by böö (shaman) Altanduulag, Abaga Banner, Southern Mongolia (Inner Mongolian Autonomic Reagion, China).


Footnotes
[1] Koskentola,Kristiina. “Soils, Séances, Sciences and Politics - On the Posthuman and New Materialism,” Institute for Provocation, 2018. 

[2] Dolphijn, Rick. “Cartesianism and its More-Than-Human Undercurrents - Rethinking Animism with Simondon and Ghosh, Through Metempsychosis and Mumming.” In Enfleshed-Ecologies of Entities and Beings, p.145-147, Onomatopee, 2023.

[3] Wilson,Shawn. “Research is Ceremony: Indigenous Research Methods,”pp.73 , Fernwood Publishing, 2008.

[4] Koskentola,Kristiina. “Flesh and Metal. Lights and Oil.Enfleshed-Ecologies of Entities and Beings.”Onomatopee, 2023.

[5] Koskentola,Kristiina. “Soils, Séances, Sciences and Politics - On the Posthuman and New Materialism,”
Institute for Provocation, 2018.



Term Anthropocene
Contributor Haoge Gan

The Anthropocene, as a debatable geological epoch, was first proposed by atmospheric chemist Paul Crutzen in 2000. Crutzen argued that the Earth System had undergone irreversible mutations, entering a state where the current epoch Holocene was no longer appropriate. The Anthropocene Working Group (AWG) later advanced this understanding, asserting that the Anthropocene emerged from mid-twentieth-century planetary transformations, a period closely linked to the onset of the Great Acceleration.

The AWG have been coordinating investigations aimed at confirming the Anthropocene as a formal geological time unit by examining key anthropogenic markers in the geological record. Although the proposal to formalize the Anthropocene as a geological epoch was rejected by the International Commission on Stratigraphy (ICS) in 2024, the identified markers indicate profound alterations to planetary cycles.

The Anthropocene is not an immoderate extension of anthropocentrism.Its root, Anthropo-, reflects not only the extent of human impact on the Earth but also suggests the anthropomorphism of the more-than-human entities, now infused with human-like characteristics. Unlike (meta-)morphism, which implies continuous transformation across various agents, (anthropo-)morphism points to a highly hybrid state where increasing human input becomes irreversibly embedded in both animate and inanimate entities. This epoch is also marked by the actions of these anthropomorphised, which may emote, react, or even seek retribution against those once identified as the Anthroposwho no longer could be regarded as one unified agent.


Term Anthropocene
Contributor Haoge Gan

As a new geological epoch, the Anthropocene is where the world-system(s) dominates and impacts the Earth System at unprecedented scales and intensities. This epoch invites critical inquiry in navigating the tensions across these systems, not only regarding humanity as a collective but also concerning individual actors. However, the term Anthropocene itself faces challenges, as it has been interpreted in distinct ways across the various disciplines it traverses. These divergent perspectives often lead to misunderstandings, highlighting a diminishing mutual comprehension within this inquiry. These differences must be rigorously examined and, when necessary, contested.

These controversies expose the lingering inertia from the Holocene, where nature has been viewed as a passive backdrop to human society. The Anthropocene underscores the urgent need for a comprehensive reorganization, particularly in how facts are constructed, how infrastructures are operated and how protocols are settled. Navigating in the Anthropocene demands not trying to “reconciliation” of nature and society into a larger system, but rather a circumvention of that division altogether. This circumvention prompts inquiries into the redistribution and relocation of agencies, the establishment of cosmopolitics, and the forging of bound that ground us to the Earth, where we have long subsisted and will continue to co-inhabit with.