Field Note Notes on Dualisms
Contributor Kristiina Koskentola

Dualisms, such as mind-body, human- non-human and culture-nature, the ‘unbinding’ of the human life from nature and the human and from the non-human means positioning the human as the superior, the only one with a rational consciousness. Due to dualisms our ties to immanent life and our interrelationality have been undone.1 René Descartes (1596 – 1650), a seminal figure in the emergence of modern philosophy and science, and the father of the Cartesian dualism, claimed that the body cannot think. While performing vivisections, he claimed that animals were mere machinale—non-thinking, non-feeling, soulless lower beings. Cartesian dualism rendered the natural world and its beings mute, deaf, inanimate and insentient. Subordinate servants to man, who claimed to be only one capable of communication and making meaning. Human exceptionalism, the idea of human intellect as something superior to that of all our co-beings, has led to the incapability to recognize and to respect their different qualities.

Cartesian dualism spread over the world like a wild fire became the fundamental worldview. It has driven and allowed for colonialisms, tremendous extractivisms, concentration camps for other animal species to maximize their potential for consumption, climate decline, and destruction biodiversity alongside with cultural and spiritual practices and belief systems.

Writer Amitav Ghosh2 points out the Cartesian dualism as the root of the transition from animistic worldviews to humancentric. Utilizing and focusing on this modernist societies (and sciences) became patriarchal, racialised and reductionist- generating exploitative forms of knowledge that were needed for industrialization - and keep fuelling capitalisms. That have become the only “true knowledge”- as opposed to knowledges fostering pluriverse, regeneration, and cultivation that could be considered as vital knowledges, and continuums.

The modernist human has institutionalized gods and situated them outside the natural world.

In my research to oppose dualisms I have been working with Northern shamanisms for a long time. I have had the privilege to meet and work with many shamans in particular in Manchuria (Northeast China) and Southern Mongolia (Inner Mongolian Autonomic Reagion, China). Shamanic cosmologies urge for respectful treatment of the living, animistic and interdependent world that is mystical, complex and delicately resilient. In shamanisms, and in indigenous ontologies in general, there is no single external “reality” or  temporality. In this sense “reality” is a process or relationship or multiple relationships rather than an object.3 For a shaman, rituals are polyvocal, and are generative, deeply rooted points of knowledge production, affirming cosmic and worldly alliances and solidarity with interdependent worlds.4 Ancestors, spirits, animal gods and all phenomena, all entities and beings are active and vital subjectivities and knowledge –generating agencies. Across temporalities and spaces.

“There are magical phenomena, but they are all part of this world”.


-With shaman Selehada, Manchuria, 2023


For the modernist we enter here the terrain of extra-natural and unscientific. However I would rather see this as going beyond this limited understanding of science and its politics, to the terrain of the not-yet known, terrain of re-enfleshing of untangling the body from the violence of dualism (such as in modern science).

After all everything in the universe is energy. Nothing can exist without another.

Dualistic thinking enableb us human to create this mess, the period of human dominance and attendant extinction and environmental devastation known as the Anthropocene, that is the consequence of the “amputations” of the sensitivities and intellects of our co-beings and environments. We need regain our engagement, take responsabilty and humbly acknowledge that we are molecular, we are immanent, we are interdependent, we are intra-acting agencies, and not more (or less) than one being amongst other (beings): physically, emotionally, materially and ethically tangled with and embedded in Earth.5 We humans ourselves are, and are part of multispecies community. This necessitates rejection, or rather excorsims, of dualisms. As oppesed to dualities, continuums celebrate vital materialism and the self-organising forces of matter. Subjectivity of all being and entities. Multiple forms and agencies of knowledge vibrate and course through bodies and beings, organic, inorganic, thoughts, actions and imaginations, making the worlds.

“Within the porous landscape a shaman worships his holy mountain. May dried out rivers and waterfalls and the damaged land resurrect, come to life”.
- Excerpt from the film installation Flesh and Metal. Light and Oil. Kristiina Koskentola (2020): Reflecting the ceremony by böö (shaman) Altanduulag, Abaga Banner, Southern Mongolia (Inner Mongolian Autonomic Reagion, China).


Footnotes
[1] Koskentola,Kristiina. “Soils, Séances, Sciences and Politics - On the Posthuman and New Materialism,” Institute for Provocation, 2018. 

[2] Dolphijn, Rick. “Cartesianism and its More-Than-Human Undercurrents - Rethinking Animism with Simondon and Ghosh, Through Metempsychosis and Mumming.” In Enfleshed-Ecologies of Entities and Beings, p.145-147, Onomatopee, 2023.

[3] Wilson,Shawn. “Research is Ceremony: Indigenous Research Methods,”pp.73 , Fernwood Publishing, 2008.

[4] Koskentola,Kristiina. “Flesh and Metal. Lights and Oil.Enfleshed-Ecologies of Entities and Beings.”Onomatopee, 2023.

[5] Koskentola,Kristiina. “Soils, Séances, Sciences and Politics - On the Posthuman and New Materialism,”
Institute for Provocation, 2018.



Term Agency
Contributor Kan Li

Agency, as the capacity to act, is essential in shaping the very existence of the phenomena that are trying to document, articulate and mobilise, fundamentally challenging the traditional divide between subjectivity and objectivity. To be a subject is to share agency with others, rather than act autonomously against an objective background. Existence and meaning are intertwined as agents' actions translate into discourse through metamorphosis, it is imperative to make agency sensible and recognisable before it solidifies into defined actors or shapes.  

The condition to live in the Anthropocene is to realise that all agents possess evolving destinies, this understanding of agency compels us to rethink political composition. The critical task is not to reconcile the opposition between nature and culture but to distribute agency widely and differentially  — until we have thoroughly lost any relation between those two dichotomies.


Term Agency
Contributor Haoge Gan

Traditionally understood as the capacity of human actors to act and influence their surroundings, agency has long been regarded as an exclusively human quality—a form of power distinct to human autonomy. "Modern humans" have historically obscured this multiple forms of agencies by maintaining the binary opposition of Nature/Culture, entrenching object/subject distinctions.

However, agency extends beyond humans, distributed across the network of both human and non-human actors. In the Anthropocene, we can no longer view nature as a passive backdrop for human agency; it must be recognized as an active, dynamic subject in its own right. Agency is not a unilateral power from a single side but rather shared, emerging from the interactions between various entities. It is the process of mediation—the relational redistributions across subjects, whether animate or inanimate.

To reset ourselves within these intersubjectivities—from matters of fact to matters of concern—we, as Earthbound, must recognise the active roles of human without eliminating the myriad sources of agency that we co-inhabit with. This collective, where humans and non-humans exchange properties, underscores the need for a politics rooted in a common world that is progressively composed through these interactions which is required by the establishment of cosmopolitics. Demanding the recognition of the multiplicity of agencies open towards divergent futurities.