Agency, as the capacity to act, is essential in shaping the very existence of the phenomena that are trying to document, articulate and mobilise, fundamentally challenging the traditional divide between subjectivity and objectivity. To be a subject is to share agency with others, rather than act autonomously against an objective background. Existence and meaning are intertwined as agents' actions translate into discourse through metamorphosis, it is imperative to make agency sensible and recognisable before it solidifies into defined actors or shapes.
The condition to live in the Anthropocene is to realise that all agents possess evolving destinies, this understanding of agency compels us to rethink political composition. The critical task is not to reconcile the opposition between nature and culture but to distribute agency widely and differentially — until we have thoroughly lost any relation between those two dichotomies.
However, agency extends beyond humans, distributed across the network of both human and non-human actors. In the Anthropocene, we can no longer view Nature as a passive backdrop for human agency; it must be recognized as an active, dynamic subject in its own right. Agency is not a unilateral power from a single side but rather shared, emerging from the interactions between various entities. It is the process of mediation—the relational redistributions across subjects, whether animate or inanimate.
To reset ourselves within these intersubjectivities—from matters of fact to matters of concern—we, as Earthbound, must recognise the active roles of human without eliminating the myriad sources of agency that we co-inhabit with. This collective, where humans and non-humans exchange properties, underscores the need for a politics rooted in a common world that is progressively composed through these interactions which is required by the establishment of cosmopolitics. Demanding the recognition of the multiplicity of agencies open towards divergent futurities.